AAB may organise evidence, expose contradictions and propose questions. It does not approve scientific truth, regulated activity or real-world execution.
Practical trust
Clear boundaries before participation begins.
AAB is designed to support scientific understanding while keeping ownership, authority, uncertainty and responsibility visible.
Plain-language commitments
What AAB does—and what it does not do.
Detailed agreements will vary by country, institution and jurisdiction. These principles describe the public foundation that should remain true in every governed deployment.
Participation must define ownership, permitted use, access, jurisdiction and retention before operational data enters a governed workspace.
Claims should remain connected to their sources, context, review status, limitations and lineage rather than becoming detached summaries.
Missing information stays missing. Scenarios remain distinct from facts. Contradictions and negative outcomes are preserved for review.
An account is not authority. Roles, country scope, institution membership and protected access are resolved from controlled records and fail closed when uncertain.
New domains, countries and capabilities require explicit governance, evidence and accountable human approval; they are not activated automatically.
Institutional review
Need a deeper governance discussion?
AAB can discuss prospective data, authority and participation boundaries before any pilot commitment or protected access is created.